Grid to Mesh_2

| | Comments (1)
Using the same form, I modeled it quickly and the result is interesting.  The intention was for the image on the left to be seen from inside, however the back proved to be interesting, so maybe the 'grid' is seen from outside and the anomaly from the inside?  Don't know, just a test.  I had a TS with John Noel, who suggested I come to a conclusion about density and 'meshing' through test models, so...  To model the negative to be cast each time will take ages, so I'm thinking about testing thickness vs. thinness and gridding as opposed to 'detailed effect'.  Thoughts?

090303_mesh-options_1_render.jpg

1 Comments

Natasha Sandmeier said:

agreed, in this pair of images, one on right is more interesting because left grid is highly graphic. HOWEVER, reading of grid on left is also so brutal because you haven't shown a version where it's embedded variably within your thick/thin marble. You're still not developing a marble shaping strategy that speaks to the surface material, the stations, the light or the interior. So, do that as well and then decide which is more interesting, grid in or grid out.

all for now. N

Leave a comment

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by Tarek Shamma published on March 4, 2009 11:01 AM.

crease and light was the previous entry in this blog.

Light Creases is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.

Powered by Movable Type 4.01