1. make it look less like diagrams, and more like excavating/digging
2. buildings outside your site have too much graphic weight - make YOUR plan larger or graphically stronger within the composition.
3. is there a reason it is so shifted to the right of the square? does it help the image?
4. if you do plate on acetate, site buildings should only appear on 1 of the layers. be deliberate. Site boundary also on a layer, all BOUNDARIES on separate layers. All excavation sequences on separate layers. Be innovative - don't just treat this as a diagrammatic exercise.
all for now! N
Fionnuala Heidenreich said:
hey Marco,
i like how the market acts like a buffer between the rest of the city and the residents. DOes there need to be 1 big market space though?
If you see the space of your intervention as being one thick or expanded boundary that really fills the site then there could be a series of these market spaces embedded at strategic points within it.
Speak soon
Leave a comment
About this Entry
This page contains a single entry by Marco Ginex published on May 12, 2009 12:57 PM.
1. make it look less like diagrams, and more like excavating/digging
2. buildings outside your site have too much graphic weight - make YOUR plan larger or graphically stronger within the composition.
3. is there a reason it is so shifted to the right of the square? does it help the image?
4. if you do plate on acetate, site buildings should only appear on 1 of the layers. be deliberate. Site boundary also on a layer, all BOUNDARIES on separate layers. All excavation sequences on separate layers. Be innovative - don't just treat this as a diagrammatic exercise.
all for now! N
hey Marco,
i like how the market acts like a buffer between the rest of the city and the residents. DOes there need to be 1 big market space though?
If you see the space of your intervention as being one thick or expanded boundary that really fills the site then there could be a series of these market spaces embedded at strategic points within it.
Speak soon