next steps..
okay, so there are 3 areas that are linked and need to be developed:
1. overall composition. 2. How the spaces are inhabited 3. The sequence of views.
These last couple of days I've been building the model where I will be rehearsing my scenarios.
As brought up from preview, there is a need to: establish a hierarchy of views, bring back fragment behaviours from 1st term model, make the intervention less of a literal pictorial translation and more spatial, make a more extreme change or intervention to the site and that the space of the viewer is to be activated by the intervention. So, Monia and I were discussing how both the hierarchy of views and the way the fragments are to be inhabited are based on the scale of the spaces. The scale of EURs Fascistic space renders the individual and their actions invisible. The programmes that Im introducing have specific spatial scales. E.g the galleries have more dense sequence of spaces, as opposed to the music hall that has an open, wider sense of scale.
These types of spaces match with how the fragment is performing structurally also. FOr example, the space of the gallery fragments are narrow and more like inhabitable building cladding where as the music hall fragment is a solid chunk of space that sits currently stands on the existing traffic island.
SO later this weekend, I will blog this drawn up logic whcih will inform me when making the scenarios on the physcial model.
Secondly, I am currently making the intervention as a folded out pattern that is marked with the sections so that it will be simple to update the pattern with info from the scenarios. Once areas or fragments become more fixed, i will replace the pattern with the structural frame work.
1. overall composition. 2. How the spaces are inhabited 3. The sequence of views.
These last couple of days I've been building the model where I will be rehearsing my scenarios.
As brought up from preview, there is a need to: establish a hierarchy of views, bring back fragment behaviours from 1st term model, make the intervention less of a literal pictorial translation and more spatial, make a more extreme change or intervention to the site and that the space of the viewer is to be activated by the intervention. So, Monia and I were discussing how both the hierarchy of views and the way the fragments are to be inhabited are based on the scale of the spaces. The scale of EURs Fascistic space renders the individual and their actions invisible. The programmes that Im introducing have specific spatial scales. E.g the galleries have more dense sequence of spaces, as opposed to the music hall that has an open, wider sense of scale.
These types of spaces match with how the fragment is performing structurally also. FOr example, the space of the gallery fragments are narrow and more like inhabitable building cladding where as the music hall fragment is a solid chunk of space that sits currently stands on the existing traffic island.
SO later this weekend, I will blog this drawn up logic whcih will inform me when making the scenarios on the physcial model.
Secondly, I am currently making the intervention as a folded out pattern that is marked with the sections so that it will be simple to update the pattern with info from the scenarios. Once areas or fragments become more fixed, i will replace the pattern with the structural frame work.
Leave a comment