This situation involves a detached edge, an anchored fragment and a face of a fragment that wants to meet with the others. Each destroy or bring parts of their field to various degrees. This situation uses less pulling/distortion that the other drawing and instead uses rotation.
Now I will imagine a scenario that is more direct.
Now I will imagine a scenario that is more direct.
more more! probably it is because you are still working on and my comment will not be veru usefull... But yes do the scenario, so all your operations on the fragments will be in one drawing (incorporate the 3d too. like we said a plate/drawing/model with some fragments that are models...). We should not see boxes or grid, because it is about fragments, it is about merging fragments, it is about distorsion, you are using operation of pulling/rotation/anchoring. The potential is not much on the starting grid field with boxes, the potential is all in how you work on the fragments and how you develop the design. So let's see the plan that talk about your scenario, your world, with all the operations on fragments. It will be illegible in some areas, probably easier to read in other areas. Le't say now you have the starting point (grid and fragments boxes) that is more important than the operations on the fragments, but I am probably talking on a drawing that you are working on, so my comment I am sure doens't make much sense. i know i know it is coming it is coming...