




Welcome to New Town
Introduction
Today, It might seem difficult today to
imagine places like Harlow, Stevenage or Basildon as anything progressive;
quite the opposite, these post-war New Towns are generally considered dull, if
not depressing and a failure of idealised socialism. Criticised for not having
strong identities, and becoming the suburbs they were aiming to ward, in their
time, the New Towns where a response to the insolubility of city's problems,
but the lack of precedent in dealing with the unprecedented problems of a
social experiment caused it to fail.
Many of these towns developed under the
New Towns Act of 1946 now portray an interrupted condition, as they have
stopped being imagined and begun to be poorly planned with attempts to remodel,
update or maintain that have only served to patch their decaying estate.
Nevertheless their short lives of collapsed
prosperity can be thought as a sort of adolescence; as they now, like London at
the time, demand attention to be rethought.
The
project would focus on the reforming of Stevenage New Town, more specifically
its Town Centre. First, because is a town that suffered the deficiencies of a
generalized solution developed in England after World-War II, one that acted
upon the urgent necessities of bombarded Londoners but had no mercy with people
of the existing town. And secondly, because its state of abandonment still
preserves, in a forgotten appearance, the ideological foundations that
generated it and that will serve the future generations of the town.
Stevenage New Town
In 1944,
the Abercrombie Plan for the regeneration of London proposed eight existing
towns outside the greenbelt to host the New Towns that would decentralize and halt the city's expansion. Of these towns Stevenage
would be the first test ground.
Abercrombie's
plan promoted an approach to urbanism with applied notions of the garden city;
the new model was also based on the ease of movement of the motor car, the
separation of pedestrian circulation and road traffic, and the allocation of
housing, commerce and industry into dedicated estates.
The vision of life in New Towns was
doubtless appealing to the overcrowded Londoners living in neighbourhoods
scattered with bombsites. The lack of green space that was the inevitable
consequence of the pressure for land in the old cities and had been overtaken
by industry, made the parks and gardens of the new towns ideal places to
relocate. A life in a New Town compared to the one lived in war-turned London
seemed an obvious choice. Employers liked the chance to expand and created jobs
that attracted the aspiring working-class; while architects and planners were
eager to be involved in forging a new and better society from the ruins of the
old.
By the end of the 1960s the population of New Towns in the UK numbered more than 700'000. At this time the modern Stevenage was blooming and had reached its anticipated expansion faster than expected; in little more than a decade the 5,000 village became a New Town with a growing population of 60,000. Both the new comers and the originally discontent villagers where now experiencing all the advantages of modern life.
West of
the rail tracks, industry was allocated due to connectivity. The living area
was designated to the east and was divided into neighbourhoods of low density
housing set to articulate the union between countryside and town. And between
working and living areas was the Town Centre.
Designed
over time by architect and planner Leonard Vincent, this conglomeration of low
rise modern buildings was meant to be the face of optimism that kept attracting
people to live in the New Towns. His vision expressed the values of a new civic
architecture; resembling pioneering schemes such as Lijbaan in Rotterdam and the
Shopping Malls that began to dot the American suburbia, Stevenage Town Centre prioritize
pedestrian circulation by attempting its complete segregation from traffic.
The Town
Centre would accommodate the diversity required for a new heterogeneous
society; yet although it allocated office spaces and housing within, it was
mainly conceived as a place for leisure and recreation as described the
architect:
'Near the shopping area will be places of
entertainment, community buildings, public houses, clubs, cafes and gardens, so
that the town centre a hub of activity by day while the shops are open and
retains its vitality in the evening to become the main amusement centre for the
people of Stevenage'
- Leonard Vincent,
1949
New Town Flaws
Contrary
to Vincent's optimistic vision many objected the New Town project, as it was
considered to be heavily based on architects and planners assumptions at a time
where things where changing so fast it would have been hard to predict that the
actual aspirations for the people who lived there would, however, change with
each generation. The New Town model was founded on an age that still expected
stability.
'Each generation feels a new
dissatisfaction and conceives of a new idea of order, The Garden City Movement
has mothered the New Towns and now, the careful provision of amenities, has
reached it ultimate anticlimax.'
- Peter Smithson,
1955
The
Smithsons concern with the quality of the architecture reflected the view of
many that the result of the countryside and town union was merely suburban
housing estates isolated from each other by functionless green space and
large-scale road systems, dessert grass borders and a concrete sterile suburban
atmosphere.
The poor
building quality caused by rapid and industrialized methods of construction
made the town a bland field of repeated standardized typologies. In this sense,
social planning and social development are altogether different. It is one
thing to project the area of land to be zoned for residential use on given
housing density assumptions; or to calculate the sewage treatment capacity
required for a given population. It is quite another to plan the social
environment in which a new community might flourish.
Like
many of the New Towns Stevenage grew rapidly over a short period of time and
new urban plans that reassessed the possibilities of expansion and development
of the town were undertaken in 4 further occasions, but although the town's
progress was eminent at first, it was the speed and lack of experience in
governance and administration departments made the project reach its limits in
the mid 70's.
The
towns with the greatest employment diversity were more able to adapt to shocks.
Unfortunately Stevenage was quite the opposite, as it was heavily dependent on
the aerospace sector; and when its population exceeded the job opportunities of
the industry, growth stopped dramatically as so did construction and the jobs
involved; people in Stevenage began to commute back to the city for work; and although
the car was majorly integrated in the New Town project, the increase in use
exceeded the expectations. This demanded more space that could only be taken
from the garden, at that time the car and the TV had displaced the garden as
the dominant male interest, this meant that people could be entertained in
their own homes and that they could go anywhere whenever they wanted. This way
community life in the Town Centre was extinct.




















Like my friend Katerina, I too had TS Tutorial with today.. the main things discussed where:
Above sheet: The difficulty of the underpinning due to the limited space to perform the excavation inside the existing building, another issue related to the Undergrid (thats what im calling my new public ground) was the possibility of inserting of burring prefabricated concrete elements that could eventually join and become the supports of the transfer deck.
Below sheet: The strengthening of the existing concrete frame with heavily reinforced prefabricated elements, the dimensions of these pieces relates to the 20 x 20 foot dimensions of the existing framework to ease their manoeuvring and placing in the ground floor (new transfer deck).


![test-plan-[Converted].jpg](http://www.aadip9.net/carlos/test-plan-%5BConverted%5D.jpg)










